Cleopatra

The teacher is not a very tough grader. mean summary of her career, but made little use of the simple-minded source available (Plutarch) The word-painting entitled Cleopatra presents a fairly accurate portrayal of the events that transpired from 48 B.C. to 44 B.C in R.C. floor. From the defeat of Pompey at Pharsalus to Caesars assassination, the picture does a amend job of presenting the factual events of the period. The second half of the characterisation from 44 B.C. to 30 B.C., does not accurately depict the events that occurred. This segment essentially dissolves into a love life story, and does not illustrate the actual history of that time. The creators of this movie did have evidence to back up the love interest between Cleopatra and Anthony,and needed to make the movie interest to modern audiences.         There appears to be some project to grab the performers to the actual countenance of Caesar, Anthony, Cicero and Octavian. However, t hey failed in casting Elizabeth Taylor as Cleopatra. Elizabeth Taylor does not resemble the little that is known of the real Cleopatras appearance. From perusing her substitution class on coins and reading the descriptions written by ancient writers, the boilers suit impression of Cleopatra is not one of a beautiful char.

The customary appearance of Cleopatra is one of a woman with large eyes, a long hooked nose, a sooner prominent chin, and with whisker in a bun at the nape of the neck. Elizabeth Taylor does not fit this description. The ancient writers reveal Cleopatra as possessing great intelligence,cha rm,wit, and linguistic skills. There are no! t umpteen scenes in this movie that show Cleopatras great intelligence, wit, or her charm. The movie states that she was proficient in seven languages, but in actuality she could dissertate in octette languages. The only way in which Elizabeth Taylor... If you trust to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper