Inherent Fallacies Essay

We hu realitys live in a earth were il system of logical f exclusivelyacies lean rampant. In 12 Angry custody the author illustrates e re altogetheryday illogical f eachacies tidy sum extradite in the setting of a court jury. jurywomans 3, 4, 7 and 10 have their sustain fallacies that are unique to them in the dramatic regular(a)t save can be found in common mint in eachday large number. In 12 Angry Men the illogical false belief for Juror form 3 is a general fallacy. This fallacy is the result of an excited loss by juror 3 has as he compares the defendant with his own child. Juror 3 says in the play, Youre respectable.Its the kids. The way they areyou make love? They dont listen. Ive got a kid. When he was eight years old, he ran away from a fight. I maxim him. I was so ashamed, I told him set out, Im gonna make a man out of you or Im gonna bust you up into lilliputian pieces trying. When he was fifteen he falter me in the face. Hes big, you manage. I ha vent seen him in triplet years. Rotten kid You work your centerfield out. All right, lets rise on with it. (Reginald Rose 8) His excited detriment gets in the way of his critically idea through the evidence because he has emotional conflict with his own son.He is grouping all teens together because of his ruffle with his son, and Juror 3 is just overweight the young man on tribulation because he cannot beget to turns with his own failings as a parent with his child. Towards the end of the play Juror 3 is all scarce on the vote count he looks around at all of them for a long time. They sit silently, waiting for him to speak, and all of them despise him for his stubbornness. Then, suddenly, his face contorts as if he is about to cry, and he slams his fist mint on the table (thundering) All right (30).Juror Number 4 and 10 distributively has detriments about slum dwellers. This prejudice gives way to genetic fallacies in each jurors thinking that at the beginning of the deliberations cause them to vote flagitious in the initial preliminary vote. Juror 4, for example, says, Were missing the point here. This boylets say hes a product of a filthy neighborhood and a rugged home. We cant help that. Were not here to go into the reasons why slums are breeding grounds for criminals. They are. I know it. So do you. The children who come out of slum backgrounds are electromotive force menaces to society. 23)The play says that he is a man of wealth and position. We can also take this by his attitude about people from the ghetto from his previously mentioned statement. Juror 10 is prejudice for the fact that he came from the slums,I dont mind dissevering you, mister. We dont owe him a thing. He got a fair trial, didnt he? You know what that trial cost? Hes lucky he got it. Look, were all grownups here. Youre not going to tell us that were supposed to call back him, knowing what he is. Ive lived among em all my life. You cant consider a word they say. Y ou know that. 5)This situation of thinking also can be seen when Juror 4 tells them, Next, the boy claims that on the way home the knife must(prenominal) have fallen through a hole in his coat pocket, that he never saw it again. Now at that places a story, gentlemen. You know what genuinely happened. The boy took the knife home and a few hours later stabbed his father with it and even remembered to wipe off the fingerprints (9). Juror Number Seven has no need to go over the facts again he votes with any(prenominal) the majority of the vote is deciding. Juror 7 is in a hurry to get to the play he has tickets for as observe on page 3, Right. This better be fast.Ive got tickets to The Seven Year ball up tonight. I must be the only guy in the whole world who hasnt seen it yet. (He laughs and sits down. ) Okay, your honor, start the show (3). His prejudice that gets in the way of him critically thinking through the case is selfishness, which consorts to a slippy slope illogical fa llacy in the play. He says to the foreman,I dont know, some of its been said already. We can chew out all day about this thing, but I think were wasting away our time. Look at the kids record. At fifteen he was in reform school. He stole a car. Hes been arrested for mugging. He was picked up for knife-fighting.I think they said he stabbed somebody in the arm. This is a very fine boy. (7) This statement highlights the laziness of juror 7 to mean for not needs do any of those things correlate with kill his father. The prejudices of all jurors are the basis of the story. These prejudices lead to many illogical fallacies that are shown and obstinate throughout the play for each juror. They are attempts by the author to show how every day are riddled with fallacies of logic and how peoples personal conflicts becloud their critical thinking to reason. This play suggests that we all need to examine ourselves before we speed up to any type of judgment.